Review every proposal. Trust what you keep.
Build shared memory your team can rely on, without asking anyone to trust AI blindly.
Human Review
Decide what deserves to become team memory.
Review the proposed meeting output in context. Accept what is accurate, edit what needs nuance and reject what should not be retained.
Clear choices
Accept, edit or reject each proposed item.
Context on demand
Open the transcript beside the item and highlight its source.
Built to be used
A fast quality gate
Scan confidence
Prioritize uncertain items without hiding the rest.
Pending review2 / 8
Keep classification editable
Reviewers need flexibility when more context appears.
EditRejectAccept
Check evidence
Return to the relevant transcript excerpt when needed.
68%
High confidence
Confirm memory
Publish only accepted and edited items.
Review progress8 / 10
Only reviewed items enter team memory.
Inside WhyBecause
Confidence guides attention. People make the decision.
Confidence is a review aid, not a quality guarantee or an automatic approval rule.
- Low, medium and high confidence cues
- Inline editing before publication
- Rejected items excluded from final meeting memory
Keep the lightweight questionnaire
Reason and supporting evidence remain available for review.
Delay enterprise rollout
Reason and supporting evidence remain available for review.
Remove the compliance review
Reason and supporting evidence remain available for review.
FAQ
Common questions
Clear answers about this capability.